An unusual case of left atrial “Mass” by Ashwin Singh Chouhan in Journal of Clinical Case Reports Medical Images and Health Sciences
An unusual case of left atrial “Mass” by Ashwin Singh Chouhan in Journal of Clinical Case Reports Medical Images and Health Sciences
The patient was diagnosed with constrictive pericarditis, underwent pericardial biopsy (guided by pericardioscopy) and was put under treatment for a possible tuberculosis infection, due to his origin from an endemic area, his atypical symptoms and echocardiographic/ CT findings. The empiric antituberculosis treatment included four anti-TB drugs and adjunctive steroids, according to the current guidelines.1 However, the findings of the histopathological examination were consistent with non-specific inflammation, without signs of malignancy or granulomatous inflammation. The QuantiFERON test, as well as PCR and cultures in gastric fluid and pericardial content came out negative for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Therefore, anti-TB treatment was halted except from steroid administration which was continued in conjunction with colchicine. After the improvement of his clinical condition and the normalization of the inflammatory markers, the patient was discharged 30 days after his admission, with instructions for regular follow-up.
The follow-up echocardiographic examination, one month after patient’s discharge, showed an improved left ventricular systolic performance, without the bouncing motion of the interventricular septum, the “annulus reversus” pattern and the dilated inferior vena cava that had been observed in the previous study. The thickness of the pericardium, the volume of the pericardial content and the size of the left atrial mass had been reduced compared to the previous study (Figure 3). These findings supported the diagnosis of transient constrictive pericarditis, considering the fact that empiric anti-inflammatory treatment reversed the pericardial constriction. Therefore, the patient was decided to continue the anti-inflammatory treatment with a careful tapering plan. The reduction of the aforementioned mass size also suggests that this finding likely represented inflammatory content in the oblique pericardial sinus that projected in the left atrium. This specific presentation of a solely echodense oblique sinus mass is an unusual finding. In most cases of oblique sinus (pseudo)masses, pericardial effusions within the oblique sinus permit the fat of the posterior atrioventricular groove to “pop out”, hence the simultaneous presence of a hyperechoic and an echo-free space is observed. These masses are usually detected with transthoracic imaging, whilst transoesophageal echocardiography is of limited value because the posterior wall of the left atrium is often not visualized in its entirety.2 This case indicates that the sinuses of the pericardium should be included in the differential diagnosis of cardiac masses, especially in the simultaneous presence of pericardiac diseases.
Conflicts of Interest and Source of Funding
None declared.
For more information : jcrmhs
Comments
Post a Comment